Skip to main content

Documentation Index

Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.getcited.in/llms.txt

Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

Position bias is the tendency for users (and LLMs themselves) to give disproportionate attention and credibility to items listed first in a sequence. In AI-generated answers, the first brand mentioned receives more reader attention than the fifth brand mentioned — even when the AI does not explicitly rank its suggestions. This effect is well-documented in traditional search (users click the first result far more than the tenth) and carries over into AI answer consumption.

​
Why it matters

Position bias means that average position is not just a vanity metric — it has real downstream impact on brand perception and consideration. A brand consistently mentioned in positions 1-3 receives materially more reader engagement than a brand consistently mentioned in positions 7-10. Moving from position 6 to position 3 can produce larger business impact than increasing mention rate by several percentage points.

​
How it applies in practice

Cited tracks average position as a core metric precisely because of position bias. The Cited Index shows a median average position of 5.6 across all brands — roughly middle-of-pack. Top-decile brands achieve average position 3.3, placing them consistently in the high-attention zone where position bias works in their favor.